Shedding Light on Non-Financial Risks – a European Survey
Shedding Light on Non-Financial Risks – a European Survey — January 2012
7. Appendix
Table 8.1.4: Country group average of regulation on transparency, information and governance [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
[6]
[7]
Full sample mean
0.55
0.48
0.58
0.65
1.06
1.26
0.52
Group 0 diff-to-mean (RoE)
0.11
0.01
0.07
-0.09
-0.12
0
0.06
Group 1 diff-to-mean (Fr)
-0.02
-0.01
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.06
0.1
Group 2 diff-to-mean (UK)
-0.43 **
0.1
-0.33
-0.27
-0.1
-0.26 ***
-0.36
Group 3 diff-to-mean (Ge+Au+Nl)
0.28
0.02
0.2
0.35
0.33
0.02
-0.02
Group 4 diff-to-mean (Lux+Irl)
-0.01
-0.11
0.04
0.23
0.13
0.14
0.09
ANOVA F 0.59 * denotes significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. “Fr” is France, “UK” is the United Kingdom, “Ge+Au+Nl” is Germany, Austria and the Netherlands, “Lux+Irl” is Luxembourg and Ireland, and “RoE” is the rest of Europe. Answers are coded in the following manner: -2 for Strongly disagree, -1 for Disagree, 0 for Unsure, 1 for Agree, 2 for Strongly agree. [1] Regulators should enforce better governance through an increased role for independent administrators. [2] Regulators should enforce better governance through reinforced responsibilities for auditors. [3] Regulators should enforce better governance through greater fiduciary duties of administrators. [4] Regulators should reinforce governance by appropriate code of conduct of fund managers (such as the EFAMA code for external governance). [5] Fiduciary duties of asset managers should be reinforced by stating that they must invest for the sole benefit of their clients. [6] Regulators should ensure that the information is indeed fair, clear and not misleading. [7] Legal penalties should be put in place for rating agencies. 1.2 0.11 0.74 1.34 0.79 0.77
Table 8.1.5: Country group average of regulation on capital protection and financial responsibility [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
[6]
[7]
Full sample mean
0.65
0.85
0.7
-0.1
-0.06
0.14
0.19
Group 0 diff-to-mean (RoE)
-0.06
-0.07
0.05
0.07
0.05
0.1
0.19
Group 1 diff-to-mean (Fr)
0.17
0.15
-0.15
0.22
0
-0.14
-0.4 **
Group 2 diff-to-mean (UK)
-0.24
-0.31 ***
0
-0.36
-0.19
-0.23
-0.19
Group 3 diff-to-mean (Ge+Au+Nl)
0.07
-0.13
0.35 ***
-0.34
0.17
0.24
0.19
Group 4 diff-to-mean (Lux+Irl)
0.08
0.34 ***
-0.17
0.14
-0.05
0.01
0.15
ANOVA F 1.65 * denotes significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. “Fr” is France, “UK” is the United Kingdom, “Ge+Au+Nl” is Germany, Austria and the Netherlands, “Lux+Irl” is Luxembourg and Ireland, and “RoE” is the rest of Europe. Answers are coded in the following manner: -2 for Strongly disagree, -1 for Disagree, 0 for Unsure, 1 for Agree, 2 for Strongly agree. [1] Greater fiduciary duties should be required of depositaries. [2] A clearer responsibility regime should be instated for depositaries, with monitoring and obligation of means. [3] Asset managers should have greater responsibility regarding non-financial risks. [4] A European regime of retail investor insurance (ICSD) should be created. [5] The availability of private insurance against non-financial risks should be required. [6] Capital requirements should be increased for all intermediaries. [7] Risk-based capital requirements (based on ratings of non-financial risks) should be applied to asset managers. 0.67 1.67 1 1.24 0.36 0.67
Table 8.1.6: Country group average of regulation on distribution [1] [2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Full sample mean
0.61
0.94
-0.32
0.7
0.59
Group 0 diff-to-mean (RoE)
-0.14
0.13
0.2
0.06
-0.25 **
Group 1 diff-to-mean (Fr)
0.09
-0.05
-0.27
-0.37 **
0.05
Group 2 diff-to-mean (UK)
0.21
-0.02
0.06
0.09
0.19
Group 3 diff-to-mean (Ge+Au+Nl)
-0.06
0.17
0.1
0.53 **
0.19
Group 4 diff-to-mean (Lux+Irl)
0.04
-0.32 **
-0.2
-0.08
0.18
ANOVA F 1.66 * denotes significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. “Fr” is France, “UK” is the United Kingdom, “Ge+Au+Nl” is Germany, Austria and the Netherlands, “Lux+Irl” is Luxembourg and Ireland, and “RoE” is the rest of Europe. Answers are coded in the following manner: -2 for Strongly disagree, -1 for Disagree, 0 for Unsure, 1 for Agree, 2 for Strongly agree. [1] Distributors should have complete responsibility as the first line of defence for investors, but it could fall back on other parties if they have provided inappropriate or misleading information. [2] Responsibilities should be clarified ex ante according to who controls each subset of information. [3] Depositaries should have a strong responsibility of control of all marketing information. [4] Asset management firms have a central role in the delivery of information, so they should have the central responsibility in the distribution for their products. 0.5 1.3 1 2.22 ***
85
An EDHEC-Risk Institute Publication
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog