Shedding Light on Non-Financial Risks – a European Survey
Shedding Light on Non-Financial Risks – a European Survey — January 2012
7. Appendix
Table 8.1.1: Country difference-to-mean of the importance of major non-financial risks [1] [2] [3] [4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Full sample mean
2.24
2.17
2.2
2.2
2.16
1.94
2.14
Group 0 diff-to-mean (RoE)
0.02
-0.12
0.1
0.16
0.12
0.01
0.19 ***
Group 1 diff-to-mean (Fr)
-0.24 ***
-0.03
-0.15
-0.31 **
-0.27 **
-0.16
-0.2
Group 2 diff-to-mean (UK)
0.3 ***
0.03
0.13
0.22
0.05
0.06
0.07
Group 3 diff-to-mean (Ge+Au+Nl)
0.02
0.3
0.17
0.12
0.1
0.22
0.12
Group 4 diff-to-mean (Lux+Irl)
-0.02
0.05
-0.24
-0.2
-0.01
-0.01
-0.29 ***
ANOVA F 1.93 *** * denotes significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. “Fr” is France, “UK” is the United Kingdom, “Ge+Au+Nl” is Germany, Austria and the Netherlands, “Lux+Irl” is Luxembourg and Ireland, and “RoE” is the rest of Europe. Answers are coded in the following manner: 0 for 1.18 0.7 1.24 2.16 *** 1.42 0.49
Irrelevant, 1 for Slightly important, 2 for Important, 3 for Very important. [1] Bankruptcy of a financial intermediary (broker, sub-custodian, etc.) [2] Collateral risk (no restitution of collateralised assets) [3] Liquidity risk (freezing of shares or units) [4] Fraud (internal or external) [5] Mispricing, misevaluation, or bad accounting [6] Mis-selling (inappropriate information or inadequate product/advice) [7] Breach of investment rules
Table 8.1.2: Country group average of the protection against major non-financial risks [1] [2] [3] [4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Full sample mean
2.12
2.24
1.97
2.14
2.33
2.27
2.57
Group 0 diff-to-mean (RoE)
-0.02
0
0.08
-0.04
0.01
-0.06
0.02
Group 1 diff-to-mean (Fr)
-0.12
-0.09
-0.24
-0.25 ***
0.11
-0.15
-0.04
Group 2 diff-to-mean (UK)
0.01
-0.03
0.03
0.34 **
-0.07
0.3
-0.1
Group 3 diff-to-mean (Ge+Au+Nl)
0.36 **
0.23
0.19
0.02
0.09
0.15
0.48 **
Group 4 diff-to-mean (Lux+Irl)
-0.08
-0.04
-0.02
0.11
-0.2
-0.06
-0.27
ANOVA F 1.81 * denotes significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. “Fr” is France, “UK” is the United Kingdom, “Ge+Au+Nl” is Germany, Austria and the Netherlands, “Lux+Irl” is Luxembourg and Ireland, and “RoE” is the rest of Europe. Answers are coded in the following manner: 0 for 1.02 0.35 0.69 1.69 0.5 0.93
Not at all, 1 for Poorly, 2 for Rather well, 3 for Very well, 4 for Completely. [1] Bankruptcy of a financial intermediary (broker, sub-custodian, etc.) [2] Collateral risk (no restitution of collateralised assets) [3] Liquidity risk (freezing of shares or units) [4] Fraud (internal or external) [5] Mispricing, misevaluation, or bad accounting [6] Mis-selling (inappropriate information or inadequate product/advice) [7] Breach of investment rules
Table 8.1.3: Country group average of the causes of increased non-financial risks [1] [2] [3] [4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Full sample mean
0.04
-0.46
-0.37
-0.41
-0.58
-0.32
-0.55
Group 0 diff-to-mean (RoE)
0.05
0.12
0.01
0.03
0.18
0.2
0.25 ***
Group 1 diff-to-mean (Fr)
0.31 **
-0.11
-0.19
-0.14
-0.08
0.13
-0.21
Group 2 diff-to-mean (UK)
-0.25 ***
-0.06
0.07
0.23
0.06
-0.16
0.03
Group 3 diff-to-mean (Ge+Au+Nl)
-0.2
0.09
0.22
-0.07
-0.05
-0.05
0.07
Group 4 diff-to-mean (Lux+Irl)
-0.15
-0.13
0
-0.04
-0.27
-0.42 **
-0.34 ***
ANOVA F 1.5 * denotes significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. “Fr” is France, “UK” is the United Kingdom, “Ge+Au+Nl” is Germany, Austria and the Netherlands, “Lux+Irl” is Luxembourg and Ireland, and “RoE” is the rest of Europe. Answers are coded in the following manner: -2 for Irrelevant, -1 for Slightly important, 0 for Important, 1 for Very important. [1] Increased sophistication of operations [2] Lack of professionalism or poor training of some intermediaries [3] Inadequate and/or unclear regulation (especially related to non-financial risks) [4] Reduced capacity of some intermediary to guarantee deposits [5] Absence of responsibility of management companies regarding restitution [6] Lack of harmonisation of rules [7] Internationalisation of the fund management industry 2.43 ** 0.44 0.55 0.46 0.93 1.68
84
An EDHEC-Risk Institute Publication
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog